Review Translation: 编写高质量代码 (writing_good_code.md)

[mmcky]

Translation Review: 编写高质量代码

Lecture file: lectures/writing_good_code.md
English source: https://python-programming.quantecon.org/writing_good_code.html
Reviewer: assign below

---

Instructions

1. Compare the Chinese translation against the English source
2. Work through each checklist section below
3. Open a Pull Request with any fixes, referencing this issue (e.g., Fixes #<issue_number> or Relates to #<issue_number>)
4. Check off items as you verify them — leave items unchecked if issues were found (note what was fixed in your PR)
5. Add your general comments at the bottom before closing

---

1. Prose / 文本翻译

• Accuracy — Chinese text faithfully conveys the meaning of the English
• Fluency — Chinese reads naturally, not like machine translation
• Consistency — Key terms are translated consistently throughout
• Completeness — No content is missing or left untranslated

2. Mathematical Content / 数学内容

• LaTeX formulas render correctly
• Mathematical notation matches the English source
• Variable names and symbols are consistent with surrounding text
• Inline vs. display math used appropriately

3. Figures & Images / 图表

• All figures render correctly
• Axis labels, titles, and legends are translated where appropriate
• Figure captions are translated accurately
• Alt text is translated (if present)

4. Code & Comments / 代码与注释

• Code blocks execute without errors
• Code comments are translated accurately
• Code output descriptions are translated
• Variable names in prose match the code (not translated where they shouldn't be)

5. Links & References / 链接与引用

• Internal cross-references work correctly
• External links are valid
• Bibliographic references are intact

6. Formatting & Structure / 格式与结构

• Headings and section structure match the English source
• Admonitions (notes, warnings, tips) render correctly
• Lists, tables, and blockquotes are properly formatted
• No broken MyST/Sphinx directives

7. Language Edge Cases / 语言特殊情况

• Proper nouns (names, institutions, software) handled correctly
• Numbers and units formatted appropriately
• Punctuation uses correct Chinese marks（，。；：！？）not English ones
• No stray English words that should be translated
• Technical terms appropriately translated or correctly left in English

---

General Comments on Translation Quality

Please share your overall impressions of the translation. This feedback will be used to improve our automated translation tooling. Consider:

• How natural does the Chinese read overall?
• Were there any recurring patterns of errors?
• Any terms or phrases that were particularly well or poorly translated?
• Any suggestions for the translation glossary?

Comments:

---

Summary

• Overall quality: ⬜ Excellent / ⬜ Good / ⬜ Needs revision / ⬜ Major rework needed
• PR with fixes: #___