Skip to content

only send auth headers for proxied theme requests #6770

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
EvilGenius13 wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

only send auth headers for proxied theme requests #6770

EvilGenius13 wants to merge 1 commit into from
+14 −6

Conversation

@EvilGenius13
Copy link
Contributor

@EvilGenius13 EvilGenius13 commented Jan 16, 2026 •
edited
Loading

WHY are these changes introduced?

Our latest build, and main are having issues with app dev when using a theme app extension. We are getting intermittent auth token errors.

WHAT is this pull request doing?

When proxying requests, we will only send theme related requests, not app related requests (including theme app extensions).

How to test your changes?

On main, run app dev with a theme app extension.
Go to localhost and try to fresh, you should see a token error

Pull down the branch
Build the branch
Run app dev again and make sure you localhost is rendering even on multiple refreshes.

Post-release steps

Measuring impact

How do we know this change was effective? Please choose one:

  • n/a - this doesn't need measurement, e.g. a linting rule or a bug-fix
  • Existing analytics will cater for this addition
  • PR includes analytics changes to measure impact

Checklist

  • I've considered possible cross-platform impacts (Mac, Linux, Windows)
  • I've considered possible documentation changes

@EvilGenius13 EvilGenius13 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 16, 2026 16:51
@EvilGenius13 EvilGenius13 requested review from a team and graygilmore January 16, 2026 16:52
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 16, 2026

Coverage report

St.❔
 Category Percentage Covered / Total
🟡 Statements
79.52% (+0.29% 🔼)
 14338/18031
🟡 Branches
73.71% (+0.6% 🔼)
 7079/9604
🟡 Functions
79.66% (+0.29% 🔼)
 3666/4602
🟡 Lines
79.89% (+0.31% 🔼)
 13556/16969
Show new covered files 🐣
St.❔
 File Statements Branches Functions Lines
🟢
... / admin-as-app.ts
 100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / metafield_definitions.ts
 100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / metaobject_definitions.ts
 100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / bulk-operation-cancel.ts
 100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / bulk-operation-run-mutation.ts
 100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / bulk-operation-run-query.ts
 100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / get-bulk-operation-by-id.ts
 100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / list-bulk-operations.ts
 100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / staged-uploads-create.ts
 100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / fetch_store_by_domain.ts
 100% 100% 100% 100%
🔴
... / import-custom-data-definitions.ts
 0% 100% 0% 0%
🔴
... / cancel.ts
 0% 100% 0% 0%
🔴
... / execute.ts
 0% 0% 0% 0%
🔴
... / status.ts
 0% 0% 0% 0%
🔴
... / pull.ts
 0% 100% 0% 0%
🟡
... / execute-operation.ts
 75% 50% 100% 75%
🔴
... / pull.ts
 0% 0% 0% 0%
🟢
... / bulk-operation-status.ts
 96.55% 92.11% 100% 100%
🟢
... / cancel-bulk-operation.ts
 100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / constants.ts
 100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / download-bulk-operation-results.ts
 100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / execute-bulk-operation.ts
 92.06% 86.05% 100% 93.55%
🟢
... / format-bulk-operation-status.ts
 100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / run-mutation.ts
 100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / run-query.ts
 100% 100% 100% 100%
🟡
... / stage-file.ts
 73.53% 62.5% 85.71% 72.73%
🟢
... / watch-bulk-operation.ts
 100% 94.74% 100% 100%
🟢
... / declarative-definitions.ts
 98.54% 93.18% 100% 98.51%
🟢
... / common.ts
 97.62% 95% 100% 97.06%
🟢
... / execute-command-helpers.ts
 100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / file-formatter.ts
 100% 100% 100% 100%
🔴
... / promiseWithResolvers.ts
 33.33% 50% 50% 33.33%
Show files with reduced coverage 🔻
St.❔
 File Statements Branches Functions Lines
🔴
... / execute.ts
 0%
0% (-100% 🔻)
 0% 0%
🟢
... / loader.ts
94.06% (+0.2% 🔼)
86.41% (-0.42% 🔻)
97.17% (+0.11% 🔼)
94.85% (+0.18% 🔼)
🟢
... / extension-instance.ts
84.8% (+0.23% 🔼)
77.6% (-0.91% 🔻)
92.06% (+0.13% 🔼)
85.11% (+0.24% 🔼)
🟡
... / specification.ts
69.64% (+0.55% 🔼)
75.61% (+2.44% 🔼)
76.47% (-1.31% 🔻)
69.39% (+0.64% 🔼)
🟢
... / ui_extension.ts
87.9% (-6.93% 🔻)
77.19% (-4.06% 🔻)
85.19% (-14.81% 🔻)
90.07% (-6.39% 🔻)
🟢
... / deploy-release.ts
97.4% (-2.6% 🔻)
96.55% (-3.45% 🔻)
 100% 100%
🟢
... / store-context.ts
 100%
82.35% (-0.98% 🔻)
 100% 100%
🟢
... / Logs.tsx
 90%
90.91% (-5.97% 🔻)
 100% 90%
🟢
... / fetch.ts
84.21% (+0.88% 🔼)
82.35% (-0.98% 🔻)
 75%
85.29% (+1.42% 🔼)
🟢
... / app-event-watcher-handler.ts
86.36% (-4.11% 🔻)
 75% 86.67%
85.71% (-5.19% 🔻)
🟢
... / bundle.ts
 93.22%
63.33% (-3.33% 🔻)
94.12% (+5.88% 🔼)
 96.3%
🟢
... / developer-platform-client.ts
84.62% (-1.5% 🔻)
71.43% (+0.84% 🔼)
81.82% (+1.82% 🔼)
93.75% (+0.42% 🔼)
🔴
... / http-reverse-proxy.ts
58.97% (-4.91% 🔻)
37.04% (-2.96% 🔻)
58.33% (-5.3% 🔻)
59.46% (-5.25% 🔻)
🔴
... / app-management-client.ts
53.69% (-0.16% 🔻)
 47.47%
50% (-0.45% 🔻)
52.53% (-0.17% 🔻)
🟢
... / api.ts
87.07% (-0.43% 🔻)
76.71% (-0.1% 🔻)
 100%
86.49% (-0.43% 🔻)
🟢
... / SingleTask.tsx
84.21% (-15.79% 🔻)
50% (-50% 🔻)
80% (-20% 🔻)
84.21% (-15.79% 🔻)
🔴
... / environment.ts
35% (-5% 🔻)
 41.18%
40% (-10% 🔻)
36.84% (-5.26% 🔻)
🔴
... / ui.tsx
50.82% (-0.79% 🔻)
42.86% (-5.53% 🔻)
54.55% (+1.42% 🔼)
50% (-0.82% 🔻)
🟢
... / console.ts
81.82% (+15.15% 🔼)
75% (-25% 🔻)
100% (+33.33% 🔼)
81.82% (+15.15% 🔼)
🟢
... / init.ts
88% (-0.89% 🔻)
71.43% (+4.76% 🔼)
86.67% (+4.85% 🔼)
88% (-0.89% 🔻)
🟢
... / storefront-renderer.ts
90.2% (-0.54% 🔻)
 78.95%
81.82% (-1.52% 🔻)
90.2% (-0.54% 🔻)
🟡
... / theme-polling.ts
67.12% (-0.93% 🔻)
 68.75% 78.57%
66.67% (-0.98% 🔻)

Test suite run success

3652 tests passing in 1428 suites.

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 4fa265a

@graygilmore
Copy link
Contributor

graygilmore commented Jan 16, 2026

/snapit

graygilmore
graygilmore approved these changes Jan 16, 2026
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@graygilmore graygilmore left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎩 👍🏻

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@graygilmore graygilmore graygilmore approved these changes

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@EvilGenius13 @graygilmore