Skip to content

Conversation

@josepmariapujol-unity
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Please fill this section with a description what the pull request is trying to address and what changes were made.

Testing status & QA

Please describe the testing already done by you and what testing you request/recommend QA to execute. If you used or created any testing project please link them here too for QA.

Overall Product Risks

Please rate the potential complexity and halo effect from low to high for the reviewers. Note down potential risks to specific Editor branches if any.

  • Complexity:
  • Halo Effect:

Comments to reviewers

Please describe any additional information such as what to focus on, or historical info for the reviewers.

Checklist

Before review:

  • Changelog entry added.
    • Explains the change in Changed, Fixed, Added sections.
    • For API change contains an example snippet and/or migration example.
    • JIRA ticket linked, example (case %%). If it is a private issue, just add the case ID without a link.
    • Jira port for the next release set as "Resolved".
  • Tests added/changed, if applicable.
    • Functional tests Area_CanDoX, Area_CanDoX_EvenIfYIsTheCase, Area_WhenIDoX_AndYHappens_ThisIsTheResult.
    • Performance tests.
    • Integration tests.
  • Docs for new/changed API's.
    • Xmldoc cross references are set correctly.
    • Added explanation how the API works.
    • Usage code examples added.
    • The manual is updated, if needed.

During merge:

  • Commit message for squash-merge is prefixed with one of the list:
    • NEW: ___.
    • FIX: ___.
    • DOCS: ___.
    • CHANGE: ___.
    • RELEASE: 1.1.0-preview.3.

@u-pr-agent
Copy link
Contributor

u-pr-agent bot commented Jan 16, 2026

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪

Single whitespace-only change with no functional impact, so review is trivial.
🏅 Score: 98

No behavior change introduced and the diff is minimal, but it also provides no functional value beyond formatting.
🧪 No relevant tests
🔒 No security concerns identified
⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

  • Update review

🤖 Helpful? Please react with 👍/👎 | Questions❓Please reach out in Slack #ask-u-pr-agent

@josepmariapujol-unity josepmariapujol-unity changed the title Update EditorInputControlLayoutCache.cs [DO NOT MERGE] tesing-ci-6.2 TIGGERING Jan 16, 2026
@u-pr-agent
Copy link
Contributor

u-pr-agent bot commented Jan 16, 2026

PR Code Suggestions ✨

No code suggestions found for the PR.

@codecov-github-com
Copy link

codecov-github-com bot commented Jan 16, 2026

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #2326      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    77.95%   77.95%   -0.01%     
===========================================
  Files          476      476              
  Lines        97453    97453              
===========================================
- Hits         75971    75965       -6     
- Misses       21482    21488       +6     
Flag Coverage Δ
inputsystem_MacOS_2022.3 5.54% <ø> (ø)
inputsystem_MacOS_2022.3_project 75.47% <ø> (ø)
inputsystem_MacOS_6000.0 5.32% <ø> (ø)
inputsystem_MacOS_6000.0_project 77.36% <ø> (ø)
inputsystem_MacOS_6000.3 5.32% <ø> (ø)
inputsystem_MacOS_6000.3_project 77.36% <ø> (ø)
inputsystem_MacOS_6000.4 5.32% <ø> (ø)
inputsystem_MacOS_6000.4_project 77.36% <ø> (ø)
inputsystem_MacOS_6000.5 5.32% <ø> (ø)
inputsystem_MacOS_6000.5_project 77.36% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
inputsystem_Ubuntu_2022.3 5.54% <ø> (ø)
inputsystem_Ubuntu_2022.3_project 75.26% <ø> (ø)
inputsystem_Ubuntu_6000.0 5.32% <ø> (ø)
inputsystem_Ubuntu_6000.0_project 77.16% <ø> (ø)
inputsystem_Ubuntu_6000.3 5.32% <ø> (ø)
inputsystem_Ubuntu_6000.3_project 77.16% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
inputsystem_Ubuntu_6000.4 5.33% <ø> (ø)
inputsystem_Ubuntu_6000.4_project 77.18% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
inputsystem_Ubuntu_6000.5 5.33% <ø> (ø)
inputsystem_Ubuntu_6000.5_project 77.17% <ø> (ø)
inputsystem_Windows_2022.3 5.54% <ø> (ø)
inputsystem_Windows_2022.3_project 75.60% <ø> (ø)
inputsystem_Windows_6000.0 5.32% <ø> (ø)
inputsystem_Windows_6000.0_project 77.49% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
inputsystem_Windows_6000.3 5.32% <ø> (ø)
inputsystem_Windows_6000.3_project 77.49% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
inputsystem_Windows_6000.4 5.32% <ø> (ø)
inputsystem_Windows_6000.4_project 77.49% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
inputsystem_Windows_6000.5 5.32% <ø> (ø)
inputsystem_Windows_6000.5_project 77.49% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...nputSystem/Editor/EditorInputControlLayoutCache.cs 76.89% <ø> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants