Support Linstor Primary Storage for NAS BnR#12796
Support Linstor Primary Storage for NAS BnR#12796abh1sar wants to merge 4 commits intoapache:4.22from
Conversation
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 4.22 #12796 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 17.61% 17.60% -0.01%
Complexity 15662 15662
============================================
Files 5917 5917
Lines 531415 531461 +46
Branches 64973 64984 +11
============================================
+ Hits 93588 93589 +1
- Misses 427271 427313 +42
- Partials 10556 10559 +3
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
| volumePathPrefix = storagePool.getPath(); | ||
| volumePathPrefix = storagePool.getPath() + "/"; | ||
| } else if (Storage.StoragePoolType.Linstor.equals(storagePool.getPoolType())) { | ||
| volumePathPrefix = "/dev/drbd/by-res/cs-"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
can keep this path in LinstorUtil, and use it here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can't access LinstorUtil from here.
|
Hi @rp- Can you perform some tests with this PR changes and confirm? |
.../main/java/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/wrapper/LibvirtRestoreBackupCommandWrapper.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../main/java/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/wrapper/LibvirtRestoreBackupCommandWrapper.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Abhisar Sinha <63767682+abh1sar@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@abh1sar a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 17143 |
Description
This PR fixes #12218
Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
Validated Data after Restore.
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?