Typo for setProject

[aliyss]

What does this PR do?

(Provide a description of what this PR does.)

Test Plan

(Write your test plan here. If you changed any code, please provide us with clear instructions on how you verified your changes work.)

Related PRs and Issues

(If this PR is related to any other PR or resolves any issue or related to any issue link all related PR and issues here.)

Have you read the Contributing Guidelines on issues?

(Write your answer here.)

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Improved code formatting in authentication documentation examples to enhance readability and consistency of client setup patterns.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

A minor formatting adjustment was made to a code snippet in the Appwrite Client setup documentation. The semicolon terminating the setProject() method call was removed and an inline comment was repositioned to maintain method chaining with the subsequent setEndpoint() call. This is a documentation-only change with no impact on runtime behavior or public APIs.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

This change involves only a formatting adjustment in a documentation file with no logic, behavior, or API signature modifications.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The PR title 'Typo for setProject' is vague and doesn't clearly describe the actual change, which is a minor formatting adjustment (semicolon removal and comment repositioning) in an Appwrite Client setup example.	Clarify the title to describe the specific formatting change, such as 'Remove semicolon from setProject call to maintain method chaining' or 'Fix setProject formatting in email-password auth example'.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a288a2d and d53fb4a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/routes/docs/products/auth/email-password/+page.markdoc (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🧠 Learnings (4)

📚 Learning: 2025-09-25T05:24:12.551Z

Learnt from: BretRen
Repo: appwrite/website PR: 2442
File: src/routes/docs/products/auth/email-password/+page.markdoc:50-56
Timestamp: 2025-09-25T05:24:12.551Z
Learning: The Appwrite `createEmailPasswordSession` method uses object parameters `{ email, password }` instead of positional arguments. This is consistent with other Account methods in Appwrite that also use object parameters.

Applied to files:

• src/routes/docs/products/auth/email-password/+page.markdoc

📚 Learning: 2025-09-25T05:24:12.551Z

Learnt from: BretRen
Repo: appwrite/website PR: 2442
File: src/routes/docs/products/auth/email-password/+page.markdoc:50-56
Timestamp: 2025-09-25T05:24:12.551Z
Learning: Appwrite v17+ uses object parameters for Account methods including createEmailPasswordSession({ email, password }) instead of positional arguments. This is consistent across the Account API methods like account.create({ userId, email, password }).

Applied to files:

• src/routes/docs/products/auth/email-password/+page.markdoc

📚 Learning: 2025-09-25T05:24:12.551Z

Learnt from: BretRen
Repo: appwrite/website PR: 2442
File: src/routes/docs/products/auth/email-password/+page.markdoc:50-56
Timestamp: 2025-09-25T05:24:12.551Z
Learning: Appwrite v17+ uses object parameters consistently across Account methods. Both account.create({ userId, email, password }) and account.createEmailPasswordSession({ email, password }) use object parameters instead of positional arguments.

Applied to files:

• src/routes/docs/products/auth/email-password/+page.markdoc

📚 Learning: 2025-09-25T05:26:19.287Z

Learnt from: BretRen
Repo: appwrite/website PR: 2442
File: src/routes/docs/products/auth/email-password/+page.markdoc:22-31
Timestamp: 2025-09-25T05:26:19.287Z
Learning: Appwrite JavaScript SDKs now support object-based arguments instead of positional arguments as of 2025. The account.create method should be called with an object parameter containing userId, email, password, and optional name, rather than positional arguments. Positional arguments still work but are deprecated.

Applied to files:

• src/routes/docs/products/auth/email-password/+page.markdoc

🔇 Additional comments (1)

src/routes/docs/products/auth/email-password/+page.markdoc (1)

16-18: Correct method chaining syntax.

Good catch! Removing the semicolon after setProject() correctly shows method chaining to setEndpoint(). This is the proper JavaScript pattern for fluent interface calls—intermediate methods should not be terminated with semicolons.

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

• Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
• Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
• Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
   | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
   Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}