Skip to content

Conversation

@Songblade
Copy link

Issue #, if available: N/A

Description of changes: Modified the functional test test_completion_files.py to also verify that all jmespaths in the completers correspond with the model. Also checks that the resulting field is a string, so that autocompletion works correctly.

Additionally, removed 306 resource ids and their completions across 53 services. Previously, nearly all of them, if used, would throw an error; the exceptions are a few in CloudFormation which failed silently. If the completions are desired, they can be added back later, but in their current form, they don't work.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

Modified the protocol test `test_completion_files.py` to also verify that all
jmespaths in the completers correspond with the model. Also checks that the
resulting field is a string, so that autocompletion works correctly.

Additionally, removed 306 resource ids and their completions across 53 services.
Previously, nearly all of them, if used, would throw an error; the exceptions
are a few in CloudFormation which failed silently. If the completions are
desired, they can be added back later, but in their current form, they don't
work.
@hssyoo hssyoo self-requested a review January 15, 2026 19:38
@hssyoo
Copy link
Contributor

hssyoo commented Jan 16, 2026

Thanks @Songblade! This is gonna take me a while to spot check, but in the meantime can you add a changelog entry? You can create one by running ./scripts/new-change. For the type field I'd recommend specifying bugfix. For description, be specific that we're removing invalid completion models. The question I ask myself is, if a user encounters a change in behavior and wants to look through the changelog, will they be able to easily search for it?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants