chore: enable CodeRabbit request_changes_workflow

[xdustinface]

Making it request changes and require all conversations to be either address or at least resolved/closed.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Added configuration to enable code review workflow enhancements.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Ignoring CodeRabbit configuration file changes. For security, only the configuration from the base branch is applied for open source repositories.

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 53a24e2a-997e-4d1f-ba95-1c382d6429c7

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 33eb7b8 and e377c52.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .coderabbit.yaml

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new .coderabbit.yaml configuration file is added, containing a schema reference and enabling request changes workflow within the reviews section.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Configuration .coderabbit.yaml	Introduces schema reference and enables request_changes_workflow in the reviews configuration section.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A tiny config, three lines so neat,
With schema and workflows, the setup's complete!
Request changes flow through the review,
A rabbit's delight—configuration brand new! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: enabling CodeRabbit's request_changes_workflow feature.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch chore/enable-coderabbit-request-changes

📝 Coding Plan

• Generate coding plan for human review comments

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 66.87%. Comparing base (33eb7b8) to head (e377c52).
⚠️ Report is 6 commits behind head on v0.42-dev.

Additional details and impacted files

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##           v0.42-dev     #531      +/-   ##
=============================================
- Coverage      66.91%   66.87%   -0.05%     
=============================================
  Files            313      313              
  Lines          64741    64741              
=============================================
- Hits           43321    43294      -27     
- Misses         21420    21447      +27     

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
core	75.02% <ø> (ø)
dash-network	75.00% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 33eb7b8
dash-network-ffi	34.76% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 33eb7b8
dash-spv	68.26% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 33eb7b8
dash-spv-ffi	34.76% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 33eb7b8
dashcore	75.00% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 33eb7b8
dashcore-private	75.00% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 33eb7b8
dashcore-rpc	19.92% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 33eb7b8
dashcore-rpc-json	19.92% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 33eb7b8
dashcore_hashes	75.00% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 33eb7b8
ffi	36.49% <ø> (ø)
key-wallet	65.65% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 33eb7b8
key-wallet-ffi	34.76% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 33eb7b8
key-wallet-manager	65.65% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 33eb7b8
rpc	19.92% <ø> (ø)
spv	80.97% <ø> (-0.23%)	⬇️
wallet	65.68% <ø> (ø)

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.
see 5 files with indirect coverage changes