fix: small typos in comments in types.go

[gonmmarques]

No description provided.

[openshift-merge-bot]

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: LGTM mode

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign joelspeed for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 38c134df-25cc-4b5f-9cde-c4ae41ef1e2b

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 464776f and 1e652a1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• security/v1/types.go

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This change corrects spelling errors in comment documentation within the security/v1/types.go file. Two typos were fixed: "capabiility" was corrected to "capability" in the DefaultAddCapabilities field documentation, and "specifid" was corrected to "specified" in the SeccompProfiles field documentation. No code logic, type definitions, field names, JSON/protobuf tags, or functional behavior were modified by these changes.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 9 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	❓ Inconclusive	No pull request description was provided by the author, which is a significant omission for code review context.	Add a brief description explaining the typos fixed and their locations to help reviewers understand the changes and verify completeness.

✅ Passed checks (9 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'fix: small typos in comments in types.go' clearly and accurately summarizes the main change: correcting spelling errors in code comments.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Stable And Deterministic Test Names	✅ Passed	PR only modifies comments in security/v1/types.go with no changes to test files or Ginkgo test names.
Test Structure And Quality	✅ Passed	PR modifies only comments in type definitions file with no test code, making this Ginkgo test quality check not applicable.
Microshift Test Compatibility	✅ Passed	PR only fixes typos in comments; no new Ginkgo e2e tests were added, so MicroShift API compatibility check is not applicable.
Single Node Openshift (Sno) Test Compatibility	✅ Passed	The SNO Test Compatibility check is designed to validate new Ginkgo e2e tests for compatibility with Single Node OpenShift deployments. This PR only contains comment corrections in a type definitions file and no new Ginkgo e2e tests are being added.
Topology-Aware Scheduling Compatibility	✅ Passed	Pull request only corrects typos in comments within security/v1/types.go file; no code logic or behavior changes.
Ote Binary Stdout Contract	✅ Passed	Pull request contains only comment corrections in a types definition file with no changes to executable code that could violate the OTE Binary Stdout Contract.
Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test Compatibility	✅ Passed	No Ginkgo e2e tests are added in this PR; only spelling corrections in comments are made.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 golangci-lint (2.11.4)

Error: build linters: unable to load custom analyzer "kubeapilinter": tools/_output/bin/kube-api-linter.so, plugin: not implemented
The command is terminated due to an error: build linters: unable to load custom analyzer "kubeapilinter": tools/_output/bin/kube-api-linter.so, plugin: not implemented

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[openshift-ci]

Hello @gonmmarques! Some important instructions when contributing to openshift/api:
API design plays an important part in the user experience of OpenShift and as such API PRs are subject to a high level of scrutiny to ensure they follow our best practices. If you haven't already done so, please review the OpenShift API Conventions and ensure that your proposed changes are compliant. Following these conventions will help expedite the api review process for your PR.

[openshift-ci]

Hi @gonmmarques. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work.

Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.