Add Agnes-Claw model to default models list#13
Merged
olearycrew merged 2 commits intopinchbench:mainfrom Mar 20, 2026
Merged
Conversation
Subject: Clarification on OpenRouter Requirement for PinchBench Leaderboard Hi [PinchBench Team], I hope you’re doing well. We are currently preparing our model for benchmarking and have submitted an application to deploy it through OpenRouter. While the OpenRouter integration is being processed, we would like to clarify a few points: Is being available on OpenRouter a strict requirement for appearing on the PinchBench leaderboard? In the meantime, would it be possible to submit unofficial benchmark results for review or temporary display? Could you please let us know how long the OpenRouter review process usually takes? We want to ensure we follow the proper process while our OpenRouter application is under review. Thank you very much for your guidance! Best regards
Member
Today, yes that is the only way official results happen. In the future we will expand it to the Kilo Gateway as well as maybe other gateways |
| - openrouter/z-ai/glm-4.5-air | ||
| - openrouter/z-ai/glm-5 | ||
| - openrouter/z-ai/glm-5-turbo | ||
| - openrouter/kiwi//Agnes-Claw |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
WARNING: Double slash in model identifier — openrouter/kiwi//Agnes-Claw
All other entries in this file use the pattern openrouter/<provider>/<model> with single slashes. The double slash (//) between kiwi and Agnes-Claw is likely a typo and could cause failures when resolving the model path via OpenRouter.
Suggested change
| - openrouter/kiwi//Agnes-Claw | |
| - openrouter/kiwi/Agnes-Claw |
Code Review SummaryStatus: 1 Issue Found | Recommendation: Address before merge Overview
Issue Details (click to expand)WARNING
Files Reviewed (1 file)
Fix these issues in Kilo Cloud Reviewed by claude-4.6-opus-20260205 · 170,673 tokens |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Subject: Clarification on OpenRouter Requirement for PinchBench Leaderboard
Hi [PinchBench Team],
I hope you’re doing well.
We are currently preparing our model for benchmarking and have submitted an application to deploy it through OpenRouter. While the OpenRouter integration is being processed, we would like to clarify a few points:
Is being available on OpenRouter a strict requirement for appearing on the PinchBench leaderboard?
In the meantime, would it be possible to submit unofficial benchmark results for review or temporary display?
Could you please let us know how long the OpenRouter review process usually takes?
We want to ensure we follow the proper process while our OpenRouter application is under review.
Thank you very much for your guidance!
Best regards