Skip to content

stty: add two missing baud rates#11865

Merged
sylvestre merged 1 commit intouutils:mainfrom
cakebaker:stty_add_missing_baud_rates
Apr 20, 2026
Merged

stty: add two missing baud rates#11865
sylvestre merged 1 commit intouutils:mainfrom
cakebaker:stty_add_missing_baud_rates

Conversation

@cakebaker
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Fixes #11860

@oech3
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

oech3 commented Apr 16, 2026

We surely need #8719

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Apr 16, 2026

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skip an intermittent issue tests/pr/bounded-memory (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skip an intermittent issue tests/tail/tail-n0f (fails in this run but passes in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/date/date-locale-hour (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Note: The gnu test tests/seq/seq-epipe is now being skipped but was previously passing.
Congrats! The gnu test tests/printf/printf-surprise is now passing!

@codspeed-hq
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codspeed-hq bot commented Apr 16, 2026

Merging this PR will degrade performance by 5.34%

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 4 improved benchmarks
❌ 6 regressed benchmarks
✅ 299 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 46 skipped benchmarks1

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
Simulation nl_many_lines[100000] 18.9 ms 19.6 ms -3.68%
Simulation nl_large_file[10] 24.1 ms 25 ms -3.73%
Simulation split_bytes 401.8 µs 389.7 µs +3.09%
Simulation cksum_sha224 1.7 s 1.8 s -4.05%
Simulation cksum_sha256 1.7 s 1.8 s -4.04%
Simulation cksum_sha2 1.7 s 1.8 s -4.04%
Simulation cksum_crc32b 13 ms 13.7 ms -5.34%
Simulation cksum_blake2b 192.7 ms 183.9 ms +4.8%
Simulation fold_many_lines[100000] 63.8 ms 57.3 ms +11.41%
Simulation fold_custom_width[50000] 25.3 ms 22.9 ms +10.21%

Comparing cakebaker:stty_add_missing_baud_rates (2e02671) with main (5b54e08)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 46 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@cakebaker cakebaker force-pushed the stty_add_missing_baud_rates branch from 2e02671 to 3bd1a66 Compare April 20, 2026 09:09
@codspeed-hq
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codspeed-hq bot commented Apr 20, 2026

Too many benchmarks in a single upload

The performance report could not be generated because there were too many benchmarks in a single upload to CodSpeed. We recommend sharding your benchmarks into smaller uploads, with max 1000 benchmarks per upload. See the documentation for more information.

@sylvestre sylvestre merged commit ef5243e into uutils:main Apr 20, 2026
168 of 169 checks passed
@cakebaker cakebaker deleted the stty_add_missing_baud_rates branch April 21, 2026 05:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

stty: missing 4800 baud rate in lookup table

3 participants