Skip to content

chore: reuse mise tasks instead of manual invocs#6873

Merged
LesnyRumcajs merged 1 commit intomainfrom
use-mise-tasks-more
Apr 8, 2026
Merged

chore: reuse mise tasks instead of manual invocs#6873
LesnyRumcajs merged 1 commit intomainfrom
use-mise-tasks-more

Conversation

@LesnyRumcajs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs commented Apr 8, 2026

Summary of changes

Changes introduced in this pull request:

  • mise has us covered for deps and tasks, let's use it

Reference issue to close (if applicable)

Closes

Other information and links

Change checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code,
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation. All new code adheres to the team's documentation standards,
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works (if possible),
  • I have made sure the CHANGELOG is up-to-date. All user-facing changes should be reflected in this document.

Outside contributions

  • I have read and agree to the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • I have read and agree to the AI Policy document. I understand that failure to comply with the guidelines will lead to rejection of the pull request.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated continuous integration workflows to optimize build processes and documentation formatting automation. Streamlined tooling configuration to improve efficiency in automated development infrastructure.

@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs requested a review from a team as a code owner April 8, 2026 08:10
@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs requested review from hanabi1224 and sudo-shashank and removed request for a team April 8, 2026 08:10
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 8, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: a2138546-7383-4f91-9a61-436a51e11686

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4cfb27b and 124504f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/docs-auto-update.yml
  • .github/workflows/forest.yml

Walkthrough

GitHub Actions workflow files are updated to replace Node.js setup and PNPM dependency installation steps with the Mise toolchain action (jdx/mise-action@v4), consolidating environment management across two CI workflows while maintaining equivalent functionality.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
CI Workflow Toolchain Migration
.github/workflows/docs-auto-update.yml, .github/workflows/forest.yml
Replaced actions/setup-node@v6 and associated PNPM/Corepack setup steps with jdx/mise-action@v4 for unified toolchain management in docs formatting and calibnet checks.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

github_actions

Suggested reviewers

  • hanabi1224
  • sudo-shashank
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly describes the main change: replacing manual tool invocations with mise task reuse across GitHub Actions workflows.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch use-mise-tasks-more
✨ Simplify code
  • Create PR with simplified code
  • Commit simplified code in branch use-mise-tasks-more

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 8, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 755b8e0 Apr 8, 2026
52 checks passed
@LesnyRumcajs LesnyRumcajs deleted the use-mise-tasks-more branch April 8, 2026 09:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants